- May 2019
- April 2019
- September 2017
- May 2017
- June 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- August 2013
- December 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
NOTE: THIS EVENT WAS ORIGINALLY SCHEDULE FOR APRIL 13, BUT HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO JUNE 8.
Authors often ask me for advice about how to get started on social media or grow their followings. I have large social media followings myself, I’ve taught such classes at the University of Nevada and done independent studies with graduate students, and now I’m teaching a one-day workshop that is open to the public.
WHEN: Saturday, June 8. 10:00 am to ~4:00. (I will stick around at the end to answer questions.)
WHERE: South Valleys Public Library, 15650 Wedge Parkway, Reno, Nevada.
COST: The workshop is put on by the High Sierra Writers. The pre-lunch session is free, and the post-lunch (more in-depth session) is $30 for members and $50 for non-members. Lunch is not included.
The library does not allow groups to collect payment on site, so you need to pay in advance on the High Sierra Writers website.
In the free morning session, we’ll discuss the reasons you might want to use social media (it’s more than just selling your book!), and we’ll discuss the research that shows why readers would want to interact with you and help you on social media. Knowing why will help you make better posts—posts that people want to read and share.
In the afternoon session, we’ll get into the nuts and bolts of creating good posts on social media. I’ll show you examples from people who are doing it well, share resources to help you make better posts, help you find the right people to follow for your niche, and answer questions.
I get asked this question a lot, and I’ll start by saying I have nothing “against” Android, and I wish Grammar Pop were available there as much as you do. Here’s why it isn’t:
1. I made the game in a way that makes it almost impossible for it to work with all the different Android devices.
When we got bids from developers to make Grammar Pop, they were all ridiculously out of reach, so I decided to make the game myself. This meant I had to learn how to make games, and as a beginner, I didn’t always make the most elegant programming choices.
This is a problem because I wrote the game so that it detects the screen size of your device and then resizes the game to make it look right. It was not a problem with the few iOS devices that existed at the time, but what I didn’t think of is that there are many, many different Android devices with different screen sizes. This causes two problems:
a) Hard coding all those screen sizes would take a long time and would very likely make the game run so slowly it wouldn’t be fun.
b) I can’t test the game on every Android device to make sure it works. And when I did try to make the game for Android (I definitely tried!), the first time I tested it on the appropriate device, it didn’t resize properly even though it had looked fine in a simulator, which makes me even more disinclined to release it into the wild without being able to test it on every device. I won’t release a product that is unlikely to work for some of the people who buy it.
2. People tell me the way we sell the game won’t work well on Android.
Grammar Pop doesn’t have ads or in-app purchases. You buy it and that’s it. People tell me that piracy is so common on Android that you can’t make money with an app that people just buy.
So if you’re wondering why I don’t just hire someone to make an Android version from scratch, this is one of the reasons. Also, see Part 1: developers are expensive.
Although people tell me they like the game, sales aren’t high enough to remotely justify the cost of hiring a developer to completely remake it, especially when it seems like sales from Android wouldn’t be as much as sales from iOS. (Also there are reasons we don’t want to add in-app purchases or ads to fix this problem.)
3. There’s some kind of problem with international sales tax.
My memory on this is fuzzy, but I also remember when we looked into this four years ago, there’s something like Apple takes care of all the international taxes for purchases through their app store and Android doesn’t. We definitely didn’t want to deal with filing lots of international taxes.
So there you go. I don’t hate Android or Android users. It would just be hard (if not impossible) to make the current app work on all the different devices, and there aren’t enough reasons to justify the cost of remaking it from scratch.
If for some reason you got this far, and you’d like the Apple version, here are the links:
Grammar Pop HD: This only works on the iPad, but if you are only going to play on the iPad, it’s laid out a bit nicer for the iPad than the other version.
Grammar Pop Universal: This works on all iOS devices.
What? It’s only been two years since I posted to this blog and three years since I posted a video. Today, I had so much fun unboxing my huge Shnoodle inflatable red pen that I wanted to share it with you.
I saw it as part of a window display at the mall and knew I had to have it. I don’t even use a red pen when I edit, but this thing is adorable. Through the magic of Google and Amazon, I ordered it as soon as I got home, and today, it arrived. It’s everything I hoped it would be.
In case you want your very own Shnoodle (and who wouldn’t?), here’s a link: http://amzn.to/2pu4W4n
That’s an affiliate link, so if you buy it, I’ll get something like $0.20, but that’s nothing compared to the joy I got from opening the box.
When I recently interviewed someone with a difficult name, I spent about 30 minutes before the interview trying to find a file that had the proper pronunciation of his name. So I thought I’d make it easier for anyone who is trying to find the pronunciation of my name. (Click “play” below.)
How to Pronounce Mignon Fogarty
This Saturday I’m participating in Indies First and signing books at the Sundance Bookstore in Reno—and the store can take phone orders! That means you can call the store anytime before Saturday (November 29, 2014) at around 2:00 to buy a signed Grammar Girl book. They’ll take the order and ship you the book. In the past, people have told me these make great gifts for their children’s teachers, their writer friends, and language lovers in general.
To place your order, call Sundance Bookstore at 775-786-1188.
If you’re not sure which book you want, here’s a list of all my books and what makes each one different.
For more information, call the store (775-786-1188) or see the event page.
This happens all the time, and it annoys me all the time: A big news site (in this case, The Christian Science Monitor) has an article about a specific thing (in this case, the guy who has raised $70K in a Kickstarter to make potato salad). But there’s NO LINK TO THE KICKSTARTER. (Yes, I’m shouting.) What is this, 1999? (Here’s the link to the Kickstarter.)
The CSM article includes a link to other CSM articles about Kickstarter, which is what you get when you click on the “Kickstarter” link that an apparently naive person might expect to lead to the actual Kickstarter they are discussing. But no. It’s just to a list of other articles on their site that mention Kickstarter. I wonder how many page views they get from that misleading link, and I wonder how short the time-on-site is for that page. I’m guessing it’s less than a couple of seconds from each person like me who clicked and then cursed and left.
Perhaps even more strangely, the article links the words “The Columbia Dispatch” to a page of other articles on their site about The Columbus Dispatch. They seem to realize this is odd or unhelpful, so they put in a bit.ly link to the actual Dispatch site, but here’s the kicker—that link isn’t active. No, reader, if you want to actually visit that link, you have to cut and paste it into your browser. (Kudos to The Columbus Dispatch for including a link to the Kickstarter in the first paragraph of their article.)
The CSM obviously can link to other sites because the last paragraph contains a normal link to a related Slate article. I’m not specifically picking on The Christian Science Monitor. It seems downright hostile to readers to omit a link to the thing that is the main topic of an article, but I still see it happen far too often on news sites, especially sites from publications that started out as print newspapers or magazines. What is the problem? Do they think that if they include a link it will seem like an advertisement for this guy’s Kickstarter? That’s the only remotely logical reason I can think of not to include a link, but if that’s the reason, it’s antiquated.
Give readers links to the things you are covering.