BTG014 “Words Gone Wild” Interview

This is an audio podcast. The audio file link may be at the bottom of the post.

A “Behind the Grammar” interview with Jim Bernhard, author of the new book Words Gone Wild.

Sponsor: Hold your meetings online for just $49 a month Try GoToMeeting free.

Jim talks about the origin of his book, shares the first known limerick, and explains what crossword puzzle editors love (and hate). Also visit Jim’s Words Going Wild website.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on BTG014 “Words Gone Wild” Interview

Wylie and E-Books: What Am I Missing?

There’s hot publishing news this week, folks! I’ll talk about the details in the 8/3 Behind the Grammar podcast, but for now, here’s the rundown:

Big shot agent Andrew Wylie founded a publishing company, Odyssey, to make an exclusive two-year deal with Amazon for the e-book rights of ~20 of his big shot authors (or their estates). The deal includes books such as Lolita, The Invisible Man, and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. The kerfuffle-inducing approach is possible because the authors’ contracts predate e-books, so the authors own their e-book rights. The Authors Guild has an excellent analysis of what it means.

But I’m a bit confused. Perhaps my RSS feed is different from that of the people who run the Nabokov estate, for example, but for the last six months or so I’ve been bombarded with articles about how easy it is to self-publish books on Amazon.

Help me, blog commenters: Why don’t these authors, who own their e-book rights free and clear and have huge name and title recognition, just put their e-books on Amazon themselves and earn the 70%? Other than saving themselves the brief frustration of having to figure out something technical or the indelicacy of hiring someone to format the e-book for them, what do they get from having Wylie involved? It’s not as if they need the kind of advice and intercession an agent usually provides for authors who are building a career.

Posted in interview, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Top 10 Made Up Words

Top 10* Made Up Words

Sarah Palin confusing refudiate for repudiate and then calling it a new word got me thinking about other made up words. Refudiate may not have much staying power, but most of the following 10 words (listed in order of acceptability) are likely to be with us for a while.

10. Irregardless
9. Misunderestimate
8. Frindle
7. Chillax
6. Sniglet
5. Ginormous
4. Truthiness
3. Cromulent
2. Locavore
1. Frugal

10. Irregardless
Source: The Confused Masses
Year: At least 1874**
OK to Use? No

Thought to be a combination of irrespective and regardless, this word is like fingernails on a chalkboard to language sticklers and can induce the Internet equivalent of a pitchfork-armed mob. My only article to make the front page of Digg was one in which I defended irregardless’s status as a word (a bad, bad word you shouldn’t use) and was flamed to kingdom come.

A dictionary usage note suggests that the word may have gained a foothold in English when it was used in a 1930’s radio comedy show.

Earliest Known Quotation (1874): “B. Gosse, Esq., of London, who gave indiscriminately to every object irregardless of its worthiness and and could not bear to destroy anything.”

[Note added 7/22/2010, 8:08 PM: Ben Zimmer informs me that there is an earlier known reference for irregardless that puts its first use in 1795.]

9. Misunderestimate
Source: George W. Bush
Year: 2000
OK to Use? No

Poor President Bush. Anyone who speaks in public is going to make errors, but his errors were funny, which means that much like poor Spooner (the namesake of Spoonerisms), he’ll forever be remembered for his illiterate-sounding utterances such as misunderestimate (known as Bushisms).

Earliest Known Quotation (2000): “They misunderestimated me.”

8. Frindle
Source: The Andrew Clements children’s book Frindle.
Year: 1996
OK to Use? No, most people won’t know what you mean

Frindle means pen. In the story, a fifth grader named Nick gets all the students in his school to  call their pens frindles.

Earliest Known Quotation (1996): “And that’s when the third thing happened. Nick didn’t say ‘pen.’ Instead, he said, ‘Here’s your . . . frindle.”

7. Chillax
Source: Teen culture
Year: At least 1996
OK to Use: Only if you want to sound like a dude

Chillax is a combination of chill and relax. Although top Internet search results say chillax originated with the 2003 film Final Destination 2, the word actually shows up on the Internet in personal ads going as far back as January 1996 and is included in a musician’s website that includes an Ebonics dictionary with a Google date stamp of February 2, 1996. Did anyone really think Hollywood could have created the word on their own?

Earliest Known Quotation (film, Final Destination 2, 2003, Spoken by an unnamed kid smoking at a gas pump.) “Chillax, biatch.”
Earliest Known Quotation (print, The American Spectator, Volume 36, 2003): “He told me I was overreacting and to ‘chillax.’”

6. Sniglet
Source: Rich Hall, Not Necessarily the News
Year: 1983
OK to Use: Yes, although the cultural reference is now stale and young people may not know what you mean.

Rich Hall worked on the television show Not Necessarily the News in which he produced a popular segment called “Sniglets” about words that don’t appear in the dictionary, but should. The “Sniglets” segment was based on work by Douglas Adams and Johnny Lloyd that was created for, but never used in, the British predecessor of Not Necessarily the News called Not the Nine O’Clock News. Adams and Lloyd’s sniglets were used in a book based on the show titled The Meaning of Liff. Hall’s book, Sniglets, came out in 1984, and was illustrated by Arnie Ten, who illustrated my first two books.

Originating Quotation: Unknown

5. Ginormous
Source: Military Slang
Year: At least 1948
OK to Use: Yes, but only in informal settings. It’s a bit unnecessary and is best used jokingly, at least by adults

A blend of gigantic and enormous, ginormous was added to the Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary in 2007, but this word has been around longer than you may think. It first turned up in a British dictionary of military “Forces’ Slang” in 1948.

Earliest Known Print Quotation (outside of dictionaries, 1949): “At about this time Flo and Charles Dillingham had combined their resources to take over a new theater and and to put on a ginormous production called Miss 1916, starring Marie Dressler and Leon Errol.”

4. Truthiness
Source: Stephen Colbert (although there is one earlier use)
Year: 1824 & 2005
OK to Use? Yes, particularly when being ironic.

Truthiness is most commonly seen on blogs but also appears in print. For example, a Mother Jones writer recently used truthiness in an article about an image of Christ appearing on a water park flag: “[The owner] has enlisted the aid of a Catholic parish priest … to verify the, um, truthiness of the Lord’s linen likeness.”

Earliest Known Quotation (1824, J. J. Gurney): “Everyone who knows her is aware of her truthiness.”

Earliest Modern Source (2005, October 17, The Colbert Report, “The Wørd” segment)

[Note added 7/22/2010, 8:16 PM: More information on the earliest use of truthiness, also courtesy of Ben Zimmer]

3. Cromulent
Source: The Simpsons, Season 7, Episode 16, “Lisa the Iconoclast”
Year: 1996
OK to Use? Yes, in informal situations or around people who are cool

Cromulent means valid or acceptable. Writers for The Simpsons created the word (along with another candidate for this list, embiggens) when they were asked to make up two words that sounded real.

The Springfield town motto is “A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man.” A schoolteacher says she never heard the word embiggens until she moved to Springfield. Another teacher replies, “I don’t know why; it’s a perfectly cromulent word.”

Earliest Known Quotation (1996): “I don’t know why; it’s a perfectly cromulent word.”

2. Locavore
Source: Jessica Prentice, author of Chelsea Green
Year: 2005
OK to Use? Yes

A locavore is a person who tries to eat food grown or raised locally. Jessica Prentice invented the word in a couple of hours when pressed by a San Francisco Chronicle writer to come up with a catchy  name for her project. She also considered localvore, but thought locavore was easier to say and more nuanced. Oxford University Press chose locavore as its word of the year for 2007. Because it describes something new, this word has staying power.

Earliest Known Quotation (2005): “Calling themselves the Locavores, the women — Lia McKinney, Jessica Prentice, Dede Sampson and Sage Van Wing — are passionate about eating locally and have devised a way to show others how to do that, too.”

1. Frugal
Source: Shakespeare, The Merry Wives of Windsor, Act II, Scene 1, Mistress Page
Year: 1598
OK to Use? Yes

Every word was made up by someone. Shakespeare is said to have made up more than 10,000 words. Because it represents the zeitgeist, Frugal is my choice to represent Shakespeare’s overall greatness as a neologist.

Earliest Known Quotation (1598): “I was then Frugall of my mirth.”

*Yup. it’s just my opinion.
** This date is wildly exciting, at least to me. The quotation I found in Google Books is older than the original quotation listed in the Oxford English Dictionary from 1912. I found an origin 38 years older than the OED’s! I bet this is happening a lot now that it’s so easy to search old books.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 15 Comments

BTG 013 Kafka’s Safe Deposit Box, Refudiate, and More

This is an audio podcast. The link to the audio file may be at the bottom in some cases.

Sponsor: Hold your meetings online for just $49 a month Try GoToMeeting free.

Today, in the “Behind the Grammar” podcast, I cover

  • Kafka’s safe deposit boxes
  • Sad news for public access television
  • An amusing attempt by Homer, Illinois, to adopt English as its official language
  • The intersection of language philosophy between The Economist and Sarah Palin
  • The ascension of e-books over hardcover books at Amazon

Here are the links for the articles I discuss:

Kafka’s Safe Deposit Boxes

After Lengthy Legal Battle, Franz Kafka and Max Brod Safety Deposit Boxes Being Opened
Israel in Legal Battle Over Kafka’s Papers
Dispute Over Kafka’s Papers
Fight for Kafka’s Papers Winds Through Israeli Courts
The Bitter Legacy of Franz Kafka

Moby Dick Sales

On This Day: Moby Dick Published in America

Sad News for Public Access Television

Shutting Down Public Access TV

Without more funds, URTV will close in September

Reno Public Access TV station shut down

Homer, Illinois Adopts English as Its Official Language. There’s Just a Little Problem.

English only spoken here

Township adopts language ordinance

Is attacking someone’s grammar the weak way out?

By their use shall ye know them

Refudiate

Sarah Palin uses Twitter to criticize Ground Zero mosque, gets slammed for poor grammar

Sarah Palin invents new word: refudiate

E-Books Overtake Hardbacks at Amazon

Amazon says it’s selling 80% more downloaded books than hardcovers

E-books top hardcovers at Amazon

Posted in BTG Podcast | Tagged | Comments Off on BTG 013 Kafka’s Safe Deposit Box, Refudiate, and More

The Volume of a Drop

waterdropccken_mauSometimes I get a question that doesn’t have an answer.

Today’s question was about the rules for using a shortened name. For example, when do you write “Truckee Meadows Community College (TMCC)” and use “TMCC” in the rest of the document, and when do you write out the full name every time you use it in a document?

Clearly, you don’t need to abbreviate it if the name only appears once or twice in a document, and it probably makes sense to use the abbreviation when the name appears eight times on two pages, but there isn’t a specific rule I can cite. The answer is to simply use your own judgment. Maybe create a house style.

It reminds me of a time when I was a biology graduate student working with undergraduates in a summer program. One student, Roland, was particularly detail-oriented. I’m not good with names, but I remember Roland because Roland almost popped a gasket when we told him to put a drop of oil on his slide before setting the slide cover on top of his specimen.

“What volume is the drop?” he asked.

“It’s just a drop. Like this,” the teacher said as he held up the slide.

“But how many milliliters are in the drop?” Roland asked.

“I don’t know. It’s just a drop,” the instructor answered.

Roland eventually gave up on the professor and tried to get the graduate students to tell him the volume of the drop. I don’t think he ever believed that the exact volume didn’t matter, but it didn’t.

Sometimes you just have to use your best judgment. I wonder what ever happened to Roland.

Waterdrop image by Ken-Mau at Flickr. CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

March Forth: The Grammar Song

Martha Brockenbrough asked me to host National Grammar Day (March 4) this year, so in an irrational fit of exuberance–and with the help and patient support of Erika Paul Carlson (The Jazz Lady) and Michael Eardley (Tanglewood Productions); my husband agreeably following us around with a camera; and clips from my friends Rob Reinalda, Mark Allen, and Neal Whitman–I created this  video. Enjoy!

If you’d like to buy the mp3, the karaoke version, or the sheet music, you can find them at Erika’s site.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on March Forth: The Grammar Song

BTG 012 Manuscript Contests, Salinger, and More

This is an audio podcast. The link to the audio file may be at the bottom in some cases.

Links Mentioned in This Podcast

Wall Street Journal article about manuscript contests

Authonomy.com

Writing Excuses podcast

Wired article, “The Spy Who Couldn’t Spell”

Time article about Salinger

Posted in BTG Podcast | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on BTG 012 Manuscript Contests, Salinger, and More

Amazon Still Hasn’t Reactivated Macamillan Book Sales

Although Amazon said they would capitulate in their dispute with Macmillan four days ago, they still have not reactivated Macmillan book sales on their site.

They don’t seem to have thought out anything very well in this mess. So although it was widely reported Amazon gave in, it isn’t true. Most people speculate Jeff Bezos is still holding the books hostage to increase his negotiating power. Meanwhile, authors and Amazon’s own customers continue to suffer as authors lose sales and customers have a hard time buying books they want.

Scalzi had a great post asking people to support Macmillan authors, and I’m with him. Like him, I can weather the storm for a while because about half my income comes from my podcast, but I am very worried about Macmillan authors who make their primary living from their books and, most particularly, authors who have books launching right now. In a very real way, this dispute is hurting them.

Amazon is a huge sales outlet and sales there seem to be more publicity-driven than sales at other stores. That means that if an author is out on a book tour right now, or doing a blog tour, or doing anything online to promote his or her book, a lot of people are going to automatically go look for it at Amazon, and they won’t be able to buy it. And the sad truth is that a lot of those people won’t go look for the book elsewhere–they will just forget.

Not only will this mean that authors don’t make as much money as they normally would, it could also hurt their ability to publish more books in the future because if your first book doesn’t sell well, publishers don’t exactly line up to publish a second book. Certainly authors can explain that they launched their book during the Great Amazon Hissy Fit of 2010, but it’s one more barrier in an already tough world for new authors.

I’m trying to find a list of those authors. In the meantime, if you know of any, please add their books and buying information in the comments here or in other highly visible locations.

Finally, my husband imagined an alternative reason that the books still aren’t restored on Amazon. What if Amazon screwed up their database in the haste to nuke all Macmillan authors and they need data? “Um, Macmillan. Mr. Sargent, sir. We, um, need your database to restore inventory, please. Pretty please.”

Probably too good to be true, but it made me smile.

[Coincidentally, I just got my latest book sales report and I’m going through it figuring out some simple economics of print book sales versus e-book sales. I hope to have a podcast out about it in a few days. I’m finding that it’s a lot faster to blog than to put out a podcast.]

[Update: 8:38 a.m.: Two Macmillan authors who were unlucky enough to launch books yesterday were Jenny Woolf and Kristin Hannah. Please take a moment to see if their books are something you would enjoy.]

Winter Garden, by Kristin Hannah (“Can a woman ever really know herself if she doesn’t know her mother?”)

The Mystery of Lewis Carroll, by Jenny Woolf (“Discovering the whimsical, thoughtful, and sometimes lonely man who created Alice in Wonderland“]

Posted in book | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Why I removed all the Amazon links from my site

Crap! I really don’t want to write this blog post. I’m not a fighter, but when someone screws with my livelihood, I get angry. Really angry. And anger can make me do things that are outside my comfort zone.

You see, Amazon has removed all Macmillan books from its website because it is having a dispute with Macmillan over e-book pricing. They didn’t just remove e-books, they removed print books too. Macmillan is my publisher.

The mistake Amazon–Jeff Bezos–is making is abusing his power. I never worried that Amazon was so powerful, until now.

SOME KEY POINTS

E-book sales are currently a tiny sliver of the market. This fight is about the future. Perhaps that’s why Amazon pulled all the print books. If they pulled all the e-books, everyone would just shrug.

Funny how this happened right after Apple gave publishers better terms than Amazon for e-books. I hear that Apple is only taking a 30% cut on e-books (just like it does on apps), and Amazon is balking at matching those terms. Amazon currently gets ~70% of e-book sales. Macmillan said Amazon could match Apple’s deal, or have e-books for the same 50% of list price wholesale price they give other booksellers and have e-books delayed seven months. Instead of continuing to negotiate, Amazon said f-you and your little authors too.

I hope Macmillan stands its ground and other publishers join them even if it means I lose book sales . . . because I hate bullies.

This isn’t about “Amazon protecting e-book customers from high prices,” as I’ve heard some readers say. Instead, the conventional wisdom seems to be that Amazon uses low e-book pricing as a way to sell Kindles. “Sure, our e-reader is expensive, but look at how cheap the books are.” My understanding is that the many people who buy Kindles buy them to get hardbacks that would normally cost $25 or so for $9.99 as e-books. (I don’t know if this is actually true; it’s just something I heard, but it seems to make sense. I’m sure a lot of Kindle owners just love gadgets. That’s why I considered buying one. Glad I didn’t.)

Amazon is acting like Walmart. Some people love Walmart for their low prices; those people will love Amazon for their low prices. Some people see the harm dominant companies like this can do and call it predatory pricing. How you feel about it probably says a lot about which political and economic philosophies you hold dear.

Frankly, I didn’t think much about it either way until my books got pulled in a dispute over which I have no control. I confess that sometimes I shop at Walmart, but sometimes I shop at more expensive local companies too because I want them to continue to exist. It all depends on how I feel about my own finances that week and whether I feel as if I can afford to be community-minded or I just need to save a buck.

Nevertheless, regardless of your philosophical bent, it seems naive to think that Amazon is doing this to protect anyone’s interests but their own.

As an author, about the only thing I can think of to do in response is to remove all the Amazon links from my site (as if they care). You can’t buy my books through them anymore anyway.

The book links now go to Powell’s, a friendly independent bookstore in Oregon. I encourage you to give them or your local bookstore a try.

Some other excellent blog posts about the kerfuffle:

These people do a better job than I could of addressing the e-book market in general and comments such as “e-books shouldn’t cost so much” and “publishers are just greedy.”

Disclaimer: this post could have typos and grammar errors. I’m a lousy proofreader to begin with, and my skills deteriorate when I’m angry.

[Update: The comments at BoingBoing have some great information from people who appear to be insiders about e-book pricing and past Amazon pricing disputes with publishers.]

[Update: 4:42 Amazon says they will “capitulate and accept Macmillan’s terms.” I’m a bit relieved, but will remember who threw authors under the bus in the blink of an eye, to go heavy on the clichés.]

Posted in book | Tagged , , , | 18 Comments

BTG 011 Podcast: News From Our Crazy Digital World

This post goes with an audio podcast. In some cases, the link to the audio file will be at the bottom of the page. You can also subscribe to the podcast at iTunes.

Google Book Settlement

Society of Authors on the Google book settlement

Library Journal article about the book settlement

Paid Content article about the book settlement
Apple Is Getting into the E-book Market

Story from Goodnight, Gutenberg blog

Acer Launching an E-reader?

Bookseller.com article

Amazon Increases Kindle Author Royalty

Amazon statement

cNET article

LA Times blog

Kindle DRM & Apps

The Register

PC Magazine

Administrative

The Grammar Devotional

Grammar Girl iPhone app

Grammar Girl audiobook

Punctuation and Copyediting T-shirts

Posted in BTG Podcast | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment